Texas Republicans urging voters to oppose groundwater district

April 2003

U.S. Water News Online

SAN MARCOS, Texas -- Fearful of new taxes and loss of property rights, a group of Central Texas Republicans want to abolish the groundwater district that manages the sole water source for thousands of residents dependent on wells for their supplies.

However, supporters of the Hays-Trinity Groundwater Conservation District contend the agency is the last line of defense against development-fueled overpumping that might dry up the aquifer.

The district, opposed by the Hays County Republican Party, was created during the 1999 session of the Legislature to manage the aquifer. The Trinity stretches from Medina County to the Oklahoma border.

Residents in a May 3 election must decide whether to keep the district, one of several in Central Texas that manage the aquifer.

Randy Robinson, a district board member appointed by the county, is fighting ratification. He says that worries about the aquifer's capacity being threatened are exaggerated.

He argued that the data that led the state to designate the Trinity a priority groundwater management area, and thus subject to greater regulation, is based on the faulty assumption that recharge into the aquifer is less than 2,000 acre feet.

``In terms of the amount of water we have available, I think we're in good shape for a while,'' Robinson told the Austin American-Statesman.

Contending his fellow board member has taken numbers out of context in a political agenda, aquifer district board president Jack Hollon disagreed with Robinson's interpretation.

Quoting a preliminary district study that has been questioned by other district officials, Robinson said the aquifer's annual recharge from rain is 22,000 acre feet of water, while wells in the Trinity take out only 4,000 acre feet a year.

If Hays County residents vote down the district, they would make their county the second in Central Texas to do so. Comal County voted against the Southeast Trinity district in 2001.


Return to the U.S. Water News Archives page
Or
Return to the U.S. Water News Homepage


Editor@uswaternews.com

 

Forward this article to a friend:

*Your Name:  

*Your Email:  

*Friend's Email:  

Use a comma to separate e-mail addresses:

*Your Comments:

 

 

*Required Fields