Lake Erie dead zone becomes growing concern

September 2002

U.S. Water News Online

COLUMBUS, Ohio -- Lake Erie has a dead zone and it is growing. Massive amounts of research are needed to solve the puzzle and, hopefully, find a cure.

State and federal budgets won't allow it. Ohio's budget has already been cut to the bone and federal funds for Lake Erie research will be extremely difficult to get, according to U.S. Sen. George Voinovich.

Voinovich held a hearing to spotlight the growing concern that increased levels of phosphorous in Lake Erie is robbing the Central Basin of oxygen. Without enough oxygen in the cold bottom water, the steelhead trout, sturgeon and whitefish that prefer those waters must simply find another place to swim.

Researchers have documented the problem and all agree it is likely the dead zone will increase in size. Some have come up with a hypothesis for the rising levels of phosphorous, which triggers the oxygen depletion.

To thoroughly study the problem the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency will fund a team of 27 researchers from 18 institutions this summer. The EPA's research vessel Lake Guardian will prowl Central Lake Erie this month, and another week in the fall.

More needs to be done to protect one of the world's finest freshwater fisheries. Funding for Lake Erie research must be found and the door slammed shut on the invasion of exotic species.

Ohio Sea Grant Extension has long been at the forefront of Lake Erie research, despite its low level of funding. A part of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Ohio Sea Grant gets just $1 million from NOAA. Ohio contributes another $300,000. Director Jeffrey Reutter and Ohio Sea Grant agents have managed to keep abreast of Lake Erie and its problems and work with other researchers to examine the wonderful fishery.

"There are so many things occurring on Lake Erie and they are happening so rapidly," said Reutter. "We may put all of the facts we have gathered together and come up with a hypothesis for the dead zone, but we must get out and do the research."

The problem could be the proliferation of quagga mussels, global warming or simply an inability to correctly estimate the flow of phosphorous into Lake Erie from sewage treatment plants and agricultural fields, said Reutter.

"We have to do the tests and do them over long periods of time," he said. "We have come up with a hypothesis before and we have been wrong."

Most at the hearing were surprised to discover that quagga mussels were now far more numerous than their cousins, the zebra mussels. Both are exotic species from Europe and filter-feed from Lake Erie's waters. Both spew phosphorous as waste but quagga mussels release more of it.

Zebra mussels are still prolific, covering every rock reef along the bottom of Lake Erie. Nine years ago, zebra mussels outnumbered quagga mussels 100-to-1. In Western Lake Erie test sites there are now 10 times more quagga mussels than zebra mussels.

Zebra mussels are bad for Lake Erie, despite that their filter-feeding has cleared once-dingy waters. Quagga mussels have been deemed worse. And the next little mussel -- there are three species that have yet to arrive in the Great Lakes -- may be even more devastating.

Exotic species that have arrived in recent years also include the round and tubenose gobies, the ruffe and spiny and fish hook fleas. All made the trip to America in the ballast water of ocean freighters.

"Not very much prevents new and different exotic species from coming to Lake Erie," said Reutter. "The ballast water regulations have been tightened, but we are still very concerned with vessels that declare they have no ballast on board."

Those ships carry some ballast and it can be discharged into the Great Lakes.

"No one has any treatment [of ballast water] that is 100 percent effective," said Reutter. "We must totally eliminate discharges or in some way purify the discharge. If they say it is 99 percent effective that means that something is going to be missed."

The U.S. EPA funding to research Lake Erie's dead zone this summer is not guaranteed for next year, and none of the researchers are going to be comfortable with one year of study. It was unusual for the agency to pull together the funding to get the Lake Erie project going so quickly, but researchers must be assured they will be able to continue their work.


Return to the U.S. Water News Archives page
Or
Return to the U.S. Water News Homepage


Editor@uswaternews.com

 

Forward this article to a friend:

*Your Name:  

*Your Email:  

*Friend's Email:  

Use a comma to separate e-mail addresses:

*Your Comments:

 

 

*Required Fields