U.S. Water News Online
HOBOKEN, N.J.-- Two New Jersey scientists believe they may
have found a way to tame hurricanes.
Their concept would take some of the punch out of hurricanes by
cooling a vast area of the ocean ahead of a storm, depriving it of
fuel and sparing lives and property along the Atlantic and Gulf
Their idea, using millions of pumps, stems from the knowledge that
only a few degrees can spell the difference between a tropical storm
that dumps a lot of rain, and a killer hurricane with downpours,
punishing winds and damaging surf. The warmer the ocean below a
gathering storm, the more power it will pack.
While other experts caution that the vast scope and power of
hurricanes make them an unlikely beast to be tamed, one of the New
Jersey scientists, Professor Alan F. Blumberg of Stevens Institute of
Technology, said the toll caused by Hurricane Katrina last year makes
it worth trying.
"The really troubling thing to me is that it could happen any
day," Blumberg said, as Chris, the third named storm of the 2006
hurricane season, churned across the Atlantic Ocean.
Blumberg believes global warming will produce stronger hurricanes,
making it even more important for scientists to find ways to reduce a
The billion-dollar concept that he and Princeton University
Professor George L. Mellor are advancing is based on a principle that
researchers discovered decades ago &emdash; A storm weakens when it
passes over cooler water. Cooler water is available several hundred
feet below the ocean surface.
They suggest deploying an array of 1.6 million wave- or
wind-powered pumps. The pumps would be placed 200 miles offshore in
the path of a storm and spread over an area twice the size of New
Jersey. The pumps, comprised of tubes perhaps 3 feet wide and 400
feet long, would be put in position just 24 hours before landfall,
when the storm's direction is somewhat established.
By bringing cooler water to the surface, the pumps could reduce
the temperature of the top layer of the ocean by about 2 to 3 degrees
Celsius, the scientists calculate, which would cut the strength of a
hurricane by about one category.
"That translates directly into a very large reduction in the
damages expected from a hurricane," Blumberg wrote.
Katrina was a Category 3 storm when it ravaged New Orleans.
Category 5 storms are the most severe.
The team, however, has yet to secure the $1 million to $3 million
for the first step, to test small versions of the pumps at the
Stevens wave tank, a renowned 310-foot-long indoor research pool.
One reason for a lack of money is that government funding for
weather modification evaporated almost 30 years ago in favor of
grants to improve forecasting.
Yet to be considered is how the pumps would be quickly spread over
the ocean, and the environmental impact from transferring billions of
gallons of water &emdash; along with fish and other creatures
&emdash; from 400 feet under the sea to the surface.
The total cost could be about $1 billion, which Blumberg argued is
small when compared to the loss of life and property last year caused
by hurricanes Katrina, Rita and Wilma. Katrina alone was blamed for
more than 1,500 deaths and tens of billions of damage in Louisiana
Scientists not involved in the cooling project said they found the
idea intriguing but daunting.
"In terms of theory, there is no question that the scheme would
work," said Hugh Willoughby, the former director of the Hurricane
Research Division at the National Oceanic & Atmospheric
Administration. But he noted it will be difficult to design the pumps
and to deploy them in rough waters.
The concept deserves a serious test at sea, said Willoughby, now a
professor at Florida International University in Miami.
A sea test would demonstrate, for example, if the cooler water
spreads out or just sinks, since it is heavier than warmer water,
Michael Garstang, a tropical meteorologist and professor at the
University of Virginia in Charlottesville, also would like to see the
project get money.
"There certainly is a moral imperative that such a proposal be
funded," because of the high cost of hurricanes, Garstang said.
He chaired a 2003 report to the National Academies of Science that
found a lack of support for weather modification research has
hampered insight into storm system behavior.
Calling global warming "inadvertent weather modification,"
Garstang said, "It's quite paradoxical that large amounts of money
are spent on global warming research, and almost nothing on weather
Other methods to produce cooler water have been proposed over the
years, although generally not by scientists with the credentials of
Blumberg and Mellor.
One example is towing icebergs into the storm's path.
"All these suggestions generally share the same shortcomings: They
fail to appreciate the size and power of tropical cyclones," said
Frank Lepore, spokesman for the National Hurricane Center in Miami.
If they grow into hurricanes, they are typically 200 to 300 miles in
diameter and comprise a million cubic miles of atmosphere, he said.
Weather modification, if possible, also carries the risk of
unintended consequences, Lepore said. "You certainly wouldn't want to
cause these things to go careening off their course and into another
country," he said.
Return to the
U.S. Water News' past archives page
Return to the U.S. Water
Use a comma to separate e-mail addresses:
Hi, I thought you might like to read this article.